<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breier&#8217;s 3/26/09 D3 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://e-lacrosse.com/blogs/ncaa/d3/breiers-32609-d3-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://e-lacrosse.com/blogs/ncaa/d3/breiers-32609-d3-review/</link>
	<description>Just another E-lacrosse.com Blogs weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wesolick</title>
		<link>http://e-lacrosse.com/blogs/ncaa/d3/breiers-32609-d3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesolick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-lacrosse.com/blogs/ncaa/?p=155#comment-350</guid>
		<description>That was a good reading and informative. You obviously know your stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a good reading and informative. You obviously know your stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChiLax</title>
		<link>http://e-lacrosse.com/blogs/ncaa/d3/breiers-32609-d3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>ChiLax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-lacrosse.com/blogs/ncaa/?p=155#comment-83</guid>
		<description>2002 was the bad year for the Gulls...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2002 was the bad year for the Gulls&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hirbod</title>
		<link>http://e-lacrosse.com/blogs/ncaa/d3/breiers-32609-d3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Hirbod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-lacrosse.com/blogs/ncaa/?p=155#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Salisbury was number 1 till this weekend loss to G-burg, lets see how far they drop in the rankings and how hight G-burg moves up....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salisbury was number 1 till this weekend loss to G-burg, lets see how far they drop in the rankings and how hight G-burg moves up&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor</title>
		<link>http://e-lacrosse.com/blogs/ncaa/d3/breiers-32609-d3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-lacrosse.com/blogs/ncaa/?p=155#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Is Salisbury even a top-10 team this year?  Their schedule has been incredibly weak, the best opponent before yesterday was Lynchburg who is a borderline top-20 team.  The rest of their schedule was unranked cupcakes.  Looks like Berkman knew he had a bad team when he put the schedule together.

Gettysburg is a decent team, but has been blown out by Cortland, Stevenson and Haverford, the Bullets are also a borderline top-20 team, yet they beat Salisbury at Salisbury.  Ouch, looks like the Gulls have their worst team since 2001. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Salisbury even a top-10 team this year?  Their schedule has been incredibly weak, the best opponent before yesterday was Lynchburg who is a borderline top-20 team.  The rest of their schedule was unranked cupcakes.  Looks like Berkman knew he had a bad team when he put the schedule together.</p>
<p>Gettysburg is a decent team, but has been blown out by Cortland, Stevenson and Haverford, the Bullets are also a borderline top-20 team, yet they beat Salisbury at Salisbury.  Ouch, looks like the Gulls have their worst team since 2001. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
